[bikeqld] Coro Drive bikepath update?
Michael Yeates
michael at yeatesit.biz
Mon May 25 18:09:49 CDT 2009
Is the temporary Bicentennial Bikeway bikepath to Park Road still
only operating one way for cyclists?
I ask because it would appear that BCC "designed" the facility quite
deliberately ... as you (should?) do when you "design" something to
be constructed.
However, it was originally "designed" and intended for two way use by
cyclists AND by pedestrians.
So why once the pedestrians were no longer able to use it, was it
suddenly turned into one way for cyclists?
One answer appears to be the hoary old excuse "cyclists travelling
too fast ie too dangerously". Too fast? Too dangerous? For whom?
So if all this is deliberate policy, there is one good outcome. It
will mean that cyclists can travel as fast as they wish on the
CYCLISTS ONLY sections ... ie once it turns from the "shared
footpath" it has been allowed (indeed was designed) to become to a
CYCLISTS ONLY bikepath ...!
But perhaps not?
It appears there have been a sufficient number of "complaints" and/or
reports to police to justify BCC introducing the one way for
cyclists. Mind you none of the complaints are available and if
details are sought, they sound pretty sketchy.
So it may be that Council is designing the "new" path width such that
it will still be substandard for the speeds at which some cyclists
wish to travel even on a CYCLISTS ONLY path.
So put another way, since it seems difficult to put an enforceable
speed limit on bikepaths, what sort of facility is needed so the
fastest cyclists can use bikepaths but be considered to be doing so
safely by police, Council, and the wider community?
I guess I am asking why all the initial fuss about the temporary structure ...?
Does it appear or is it the case that a substantial number of
cyclists no longer use it?
If so where do they/you go ?
MY............................
More information about the bikeqld
mailing list