[bikeqld] coro drv bikeway specs....
kim
pharmer_kim at hotmail.com
Mon Aug 24 08:21:53 CDT 2009
I raised some design issues relating to the upgraded section with BCC;
in particular the use of the split face wall blocks, the clearance of
the rest stop on the bike side and width of the path. BCC responded that
everything was per the Austroads guidelines and furthermore that
"Bicycle Queensland has been a major stakeholder in this project and
continues to provide advice for future stages of the Bicentennial
Bikeway upgrade." BCC advises me that the finished path will provide an
edge line 0.5m from the split face wall, a 3.5m bike section, a 2m
pedestrian section and a further 0.5m shoulder on the river side. They
also advise that the bike rest area provides a 1m clearance from the
bikeway in accordance with the good book.
That all had me a bit confused. So I took a tape to it today. The edge
line looks set to be 0.5m from the wall as promised, however when I
measure the new bike section at the Park Rd end it only measures 2.64m,
far short of the promised 3.5m. When you get to the rest stop the track
does become wider and seems to meet the spec but between there and Park
Rd it seems to taper in significantly, but not abruptly. The pedestrian
side seems to maintain its 2m width all the way but looks wickedly
narrow for the sort of pedestrian behaviour that has been commonplace
for so many years down there. The Park Rd end is really not much wider
than the rest of the track used to be; sure it was not all paved but
peds and cyclists could get onto the grass in a pinch. So for all the
money we have spent on it we seem to have ended up with a bottleneck
anyway. As for the 1m clearance at the rest area, that would seem to
imply that the rest area is up on top of the seat there. If you sit on
the seat and place your bike in front of the seat that would seem to me
to put you just 0.5m from the track not 1m as BCC claims. I am just a
little concerned that bikes might have to be just propped up there with
pedal against the seat as not everyone has a sidestand and such bikes
could easily topple back onto the track. A rubbish bin seems to have
evolved there too which eats up much of that clearance, hoping that not
going to be a permanent fixture.
As for the choice of using the jagged split face blocks for a bounding
wall, BCC says that they chose these to match the ones used near the
regatta hotel end (a design done some quarter of a century ago, before
the Austroads guidelines and much lower in height). While BCC did not
specifically say that BQ was happy with all of the design details or
even whether BQ were made privy to all the finer design details, they
did try to infer that BQ was fully engaged in the design. I don't think
that is likely to be true. BQ may have been 'consulted' but there is no
telling that any of their recommendations were adopted or even
considered. But hey, perhaps it all good and my measurements and
concerns are a little off the mark.
It looks like somebody had got the message that the transition from the
old divided section to the new separated section was fraught with risk
but I think the complex arrangement of blues and green replete with
yellow marked speed humps and the attempt to get pedestrians to cross
the bike path at right angles is not going to have a lot of effect. Even
today there were iPedestrians walking along obliviously on the green
side. Green side? Yep the red on the newer north quay section seems to
be out of favour with the BCC this year, so it really is a rainbow
experience riding to town now. (and don't forget those blue LED lamps on
the trackside too)
While all this Van Gogh work was being done last Friday night it was
closed to cyclists by a few traffic cones, the gap between them was
wider than some of our bikeways and not unexpectedly a cyclists rode in,
there was no traffic controller. Then there was a yell from a traffic
controller up on Coro Drv, and cyclists including myself were told to
use the footpath toward Toowong. No detour signs, no dismount signs,
seemingly no plan at all. Footpath is extremely narrow there and has No
Cyclists signs placed further along and a barrier fence to prevent you
getting on the road. I got on the road before the fence but others did
not. I pointed out this craziness of this half arsed attempt to divert
cyclists off the track and seemingly onto a closed footpath or the road
at night. BCC rang me back and said it intended cyclists to push their
bikes to Toowong using the footpath. Total crap - they just did not have
a plan in place and there is no room to push cycles along there when
there are pedestrians using it.
Well I guess we only have about another five such 'upgrades' to happen.
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_online:082009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.bikeqld.org.au/pipermail/bikeqld/attachments/20090824/b7ba2ca6/attachment.htm
More information about the bikeqld
mailing list